DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2018_1_34

Peculiarities and consequences of the immediate implant prosthetics using extended prosthodontics constructions (review)

Authors

  • V.N. Trezubov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Prosthodontics, materials science and orthodontics Department
  • E.A. Bulycheva 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Prosthodontics, materials science and orthodontics Department
  • S.O. Chikunov 2, 3, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Prosthodontics Department; professor of the Prosthetic dentistry Department
  • R.A. Rozov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Prosthodontics, materials science and orthodontics Department
  • A.A. Ignat'eva 1, clinical resident of the Prosthodontics, materials science and orthodontics Department
  • 1 Pavlov University, 197022, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
  • 2 Sechenov University, 119435, Moscow, Russia
  • 3 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The article presents main features and consequences of immediate implant prosthodontics and describes its advantages, associated with fast aesthetics and function restore process, what gives an opportunity to patients to have high quality of life. Main conclusions of different clinical researches, concerned this problem, have been evaluated. Risk factors of implantation treatment also have been studied: unsatisfactory operation wound healing, bone atrophy in the implantation area, short distance to already existing implant or tooth root, wrong implant position, poor oral hygiene of dental prosthetics. Additional factors are: periodontitis, genetical one, smoking and alcohol abuse, functional overload of the bone, chronical mucosa inflammation, alveolar plastic operation, desquamative gingivitis, somatic disease. Average frequency of biological complications after implantation have been studied: it was 6.4-10.4%, in this regard for ceramics heads it was 1.9-46.7%, for metals heads - 6.1%. Nevertheless the high risk, concerned with immediate implantation loading and large extent of its construction, a positive impact on osseointegration has been proved.

Key words:

immediate implant prosthodontics, extensive orthopedic restorations

For Citation

[1]
Trezubov V.N., Bulycheva E.A., Chikunov S.O., Rozov R.A., Ignat’eva A.A. Peculiarities and consequences of the immediate implant prosthetics using extended prosthodontics constructions (review). Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2018; 1 (85): 34—38. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2018_1_34

References

  1. Котенко М.В., Яременко А.И. Оценка эффективности имплантатов разных типов при немедленной установке в лунку удаленного зуба. - Стоматология. - 2011; 6: 35-8.
  2. Кулаков А.А., Архипов А.В. Особенности дентальной имплантации при низкой плотности кости. - Стоматология. - 2012; 5-1: 31-3.
  3. Пашкова Г.С., Никитин В.В., Исаджанян К.Е., Апхадзе А.Р., Жиленков Е.Л. Микробиологический мониторинг пациентов с периимплантитом (предварительное исследование). - Стоматология. - 2014; 4 (93): 45-7.
  4. Agliardi E., Panigatti S., Clericò M., Villa C., Malò P. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaws with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2010; 21 (5): 459-65. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01852.x. Epub 2010-Jan-22.
  5. Arnhart C., Kielbassa A.M., Martinez-de Fuentes R., Goldstein M., Jackowski J., Lorenzoni M., Maiorana C., Mericske-Stern R., Pozzi A., Rompen E., Sanz M., Strub J.R. Comparison of variable-thread tapered implant designs to a standard tapered implant design after immediate loading. A 3-year multicentre randomised controlled trial. - Eur J Oral Implantol. - 2012; 5 (2): 123-36.
  6. Barbier L., Abeloos J., De Clercq C., Jacobs R. Peri-implant bone changes following tooth extraction, immediate placement and loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla. - Clin Oral Investig. - 2012; 16 (4): 1061-70. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0617-9. Epub 2011-Sep-20.
  7. Degidi M., Perrotti V., Piattelli A. Immediately loaded titanium implants with a porous anodized surface with at least 36 months of follow-up. - Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. - 2006; 8 (4): 169-77. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00008.x.
  8. Degidi M., Nardi D., Piattelli A. 10-year follow-up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface. - Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. - 2012; 14 (6): 828-38.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00446.x. Epub 2012-Feb-29.
  9. De Rouck T., Collys K., Cosyn J. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: a 1-year case cohort study on hard and soft tissue response. - J Clin Periodontol. - 2008; 35 (7): 649-57. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01235.x. Epub 2008-Apr-16.
  10. Esposito M., Grusovin M.G., Maghaireh H., Worthington H.V. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. - 2013; 3: CD003878. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5.
  11. Finne K., Rompen E., Toljanic J. Prospective multicenter study of marginal bone level and soft tissue health of a one-piece implant after two years. - J Prosthet Dent. - 2007; 97 (6 suppl.): S79-85.
  12. Firme C.T., Vettore M.V., Melo M., Vidigal G.M. Jr. Peri-implant bone loss around single and multiple prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2014; 29 (1): 79-87.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3316.
  13. Galindo-Moreno P., Fauri M., Avila-Ortiz G., Fernández-Barbero J.E., Cabrera-León A., Sánchez-Fernández E. Influence of alcohol and tobacco habits on peri-implant marginal bone loss: a prospective study. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2005; 16 (5): 579-86.
  14. Gholami H., Mericske-Stern R., Kessler-Liechti G., Katsoulis J. Radiographic bone level changes of implant-supported restorations in edentulous and partially dentate patients: 5-year results. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2014; 29 (4): 898-904.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3042.
  15. Gotfredsen K., Berglundh T., Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load of different duration. A study in the dog (III). - Clin. Oral Implants Res. - 2001; 12: 552-8. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003196.x.
  16. Han H.J., Kim S., Han D.H. Multifactorial evaluation of implant failure: a 19-year retrospective study. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2014; 29 (2): 303-10. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2869.
  17. Heitz-Mayfield L.J., Needleman I., Salvi G.E., Pjetursson B.E. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for prevention and management of biologic and technical implant complications. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2014; 29 suppl.: 346-50.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2013.g5.
  18. Kan J., Rungcharassaeng K., Liddelow G. et al. Periimplant tissue response following immediate provisional restoration of scalloped implants in the esthetic zone: a one-year pilot prospective multicenter study. - J Prosthet Dent. - 2007; 97 (6): 109-18.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60014-6.
  19. Kozlovsky A., Tal H., Laufer B.Z., Leshem R., Rohrer M.D., Weinreb M., Artzi Z. Impact of implant overloading on the peri-implant bone in inflamed and non-inflamed peri-implant mucosa. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2007; 18 (5): 601-10.Epub 2007-Jul-26.
  20. Malo P., de Araujo Nobre M., Rangert B. Implants placed in immediate function in periodontally compromised sites: a five-year retrospective and one-year prospective study. - J Prosthet Dent. - 2007; 97 (6 suppl.): S86-95.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60012-2.
  21. Pera P. Invited commentary: on immediately loaded fixed maxillary prostheses. - Int J Prosthodont. - 2014; 27 (6): 513-6.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.2014.4.ic.
  22. Pjetursson B.E., Brägger U., Lang N.P., Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2007;18 (suppl 3): 97-113. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x.
  23. Rinke S., Ohl S., Ziebolz D., Lange K., Eickholz P. Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2011; 22 (8): 826-33. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02061.x. Epub 2010-Dec-28.
  24. Scarano A., Piattelli M., Caputi S., Favero G.A., Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. - J Periodontol. - 2004; 75 (2): 292-6.
  25. Schwarz F., Sahm N., Schwarz K., Becker J. Impact of defect configuration on the clinical outcome following surgical regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis. - J Clin Periodontol. - 2010; 37 (5): 449-55. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01540.x. Epub 2010-Mar-24.
  26. Schwarz F., Becker J. Peri-implant infection: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. - Quintessence, 2014. - 272 p.
  27. Tealdo T., Menini M., Bevilacqua M., Pera F., Pesce P., Signori A., Pera P. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in edentulous patients’ maxillae: a 6-year prospective study. - Int J Prosthodont. - 2014; 27 (3): 207-14.
  28. Zembic A., Kim S., Zwahlen M., Kelly J.R. Systematic review of the survival rate and incidence of biologic, technical, and esthetic complications of single implant abutments supporting fixed prostheses. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2014; 29 suppl.: 99-116. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.2.
  29. Zitzmann N.U., Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. - J Clin Periodontol. - 2008; 35 (8 Suppl): 286-91.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01274.x.
  30. Zhou W., Han C., Li D., Li Y., Song Y., Zhao Y. Endodontic treatment of teeth induces retrograde peri-implantitis. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2009; 20 (12): 1326-32. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01752.x. Epub 2009-Aug-25.

Published on

March 1, 2018