DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2023_3_84

Comparison of laboratory indicators of adhesion of domestic adhesive complex and foreign analogue

Downloads

Authors

  • A.M. Khasan 1, postgraduate at the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5671-2240
  • N.S. Tuturov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor and head of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8048-5703
  • S.Yu. Ivanov 2, Russian Academy of Science corresponding member, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5458-0192
  • E.A. Bulycheva 3, PhD in medical Sciences, professor of the Prosthodontics, orthodontics and material science Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1175-5682
  • D.S. Bulycheva 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, senior lecturer of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0539-4830
  • I.Kh. Katbeh 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, senior lecturer of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4591-7694
  • A. Saleh 1, resident at the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9597-3109
  • 1 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Sechenov University, 119991, Moscow, Russia
  • 3 Pavlov University, 197022, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

For a long time orthodontists has been developing primers and bonds with improved adhesive properties for fixing metal braces to the teeth enamel, which is especially important for lateral teeth. The aim of the study was to compare the results of the shear strength of adhesion between a domestic adhesive system of the V generation and a foreign analogue in laboratory conditions.
Materials and methods.
The study was carried out using 20 samples of extracted molars of the upper and lower jaws, which were immersed in blocks of acrylic plastic. All samples were divided into two groups: in the group I the fixation of metal braces to the teeth enamel was carried out using a domestic adhesive system Compofix (ortho) (VladMiVa, Russia); in the group II the fixation of metal braces to the teeth enamel was performed using a foreign analogue Enlight (Ormco, USA).
Results.
In the group I the value of shear adhesion was 13.21±1.11 MPa, while in the group II — 13.39±1.23 MPa. The average value of the adhesive remant index to the bracket surface was 18±3% in the group I and 15±3% in the group II.
Conclusion.
The results of the study showed that the domestic adhesive system of the V generation is not inferior in its properties to a foreign analogue and is recommended for use in the clinical practice in orthodontics.

Key words:

adhesion, bracket system, adhesive remant index

For Citation

[1]
Khasan A.M., Tuturov N.S., Ivanov S.Yu., Bulycheva E.A., Bulycheva D.S., Katbeh I.Kh., Saleh A. Comparison of laboratory indicators of adhesion of domestic adhesive complex and foreign analogue. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2023; 26 (3): 84—88. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2023_3_84

References

  1. Ramsundar K., Subramanian A.K., Sreenivasagan S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of bracket bonded using light cure composite and with and without primer: a comparative in-vitro study. European Chemical Bulletin. 2022; 11 (7): 1—5.
  2. Vaheed N.A., Gupta M., David S.A., Sam G., Ramanna P.K., Bhagvandas S.C. In vitro analysis of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of stainless steel brackets with different adhesive systems to enamel. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19 (9): 1047—1051. PMID: 30287702
  3. Kokol P., Zavrsnik J., Zlahtic G., Vosner H.B. Buonocore research in adhesive dentistry: A remarkable sleeping paper. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management. 2020; 14 (2): 211—217. DOI: 10.1080/09737766.2021.1906182
  4. Malysa A., Wezgowiec J., Orzeszek S., Florjanski W., Zietek M., Wieckiewicz M. Effect of different surface treatment methods on bond strength of dental ceramics to dental hard tissues: A systematic review. Molecules. 2021; 26 (5): 1223. PMID: 33668944
  5. Călinoiu S.G., Bîcleşanu C., Eftimie M., Florescu A., Burcea A. [Comparative study regarding the compressive strength of 4th generation adhesive systems and universal adhesive]. Romanian Journal of Stomatology. 2020; 66 (2): 83—91 (In Romanian). DOI: 10.37897/RJS.2020.2.5
  6. Newman G.V. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965; 51 (12): 901—12. PMID: 5214895
  7. Demirovic K., Slaj M., Spalj S., Slaj M., Kobaslija S. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo. Acta Inform Med. 2018; 26 (2): 125—129. PMID: 30061785
  8. Khasan A.M., Kosyreva T.F., Tuturov N.S. The review of studies on the bonding of metal brackets to tooth enamel and ceramics. International Dental Review. 2023; 1 (102): 32—37 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 52268020
  9. AlSamak S., Alsaleem N.R., Ahmed M.K. Evaluation of the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of color change, fluorescent, and conventional orthodontic adhesives: An in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2023; 21 (1): 100712. PMID: 36493626
  10. Robakidze N.S., Zhidkikh E.D., Zaitseva A.G. Modern concepts of adhesive dentistry. The Dental Institute. 2021; 3 (92): 76—79 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 46652207
  11. Hasan A.M. Retrospective of approaches to the formation of generations of adhesive systems in dentistry. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Education and Healthcare. 2022; 2 (18): 38—45 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 49516120
  12. Hodecker L.D., Scheurer M., Scharf S., Roser C.J., Fouda A.M., Bourauel C., Lux C.J., Bauer C.A.J. Influence of Individual Bracket Base Design on the Shear Bond Strength of In-Office 3D Printed Brackets An In Vitro Study. J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14 (6): 289. PMID: 37367253
  13. Dziedzic K., Zubrzycka-Wróbel J., Jozwik J., Barszcz M., Siwak P., Chałas R. Research on tribological properties of dental composite materials. Advances in science and technology. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal. 2016; 10 (32): 144—149. DOI: 10.12913/22998624/65123
  14. Romanenko A.A., Buzov A.A., Chuev V.P. Original method for determining the adhesion of dental material. In: proceedings of the “Dentistry of Slavic states” conference. Belgorod, 2021. Pp. 243—244 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 49047619
  15. Khosravani M.R. Mechanical behavior of restorative dental composites under various loading conditions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 93: 151—157. PMID: 30798181
  16. Mehmeti B., Kelmendi J., Iiljazi-Shahiqi D., Azizi B., Jakovljevic S., Haliti F., Anić-Milošević S. Comparison of shear bond strength orthodontic brackets bonded to zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019; 53 (1): 17—27. PMID: 31118529
  17. Hu B., Hu Y., Li X., Gao J., Sun R., Zhan D., Sano H., Fu J. Shear bond strength of different bonding agents to orthodontic metal bracket and zirconia. Dent Mater J. 2022; 41 (5): 749—756. PMID: 36070928
  18. Franz A., Raabe M., Lilaj B., Dauti R., Moritz A., Müßig D., Cvikl B. Effect of two different primers on the shear bond strength of metallic brackets to zirconia ceramic. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19 (1): 51. PMID: 30922281
  19. Alavi S., Samie S., Raji S.A.H. Comparison of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic surface treatment with hydrofluoric acid, Nd:YAG, and CO2 lasers on shear bond strength of metal brackets. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25 (5): 2659—2666. PMID: 32918122
  20. Alqaisy A., Kabbesh K., Alawwad M., Kosyreva T.F., Katbeh I., Khasan A.M. Evaluation of the effect of sodium hypochlorite gel on composite bonding strength to enamel of primary teeth after salivary contamination: in vitro study. Stomatology. 2021; 1: 15—18 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 44618877
  21. Ju G.Y., Oh S., Lim B.S., Lee H.S., Chung S.H. Effect of simplified bonding on shear bond strength between ceramic brackets and dental zirconia. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12 (10): 1640. PMID: 31137486
  22. Khargekar N.R., Kalathingal J.H., Sam G., Elpatal M.A., Hota S., Bhushan P. Evaluation of different pretreatment efficacy with fluoride-releasing material on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019; 20 (12): 1442—1446. PMID: 32381847
  23. Garcés G.A., Rojas V.H., Bravo C., Sampaio C.S. Shear bond strength evaluation of metallic brackets bonded to a CAD/CAM PMMA material compared to traditional prosthetic temporary materials: an in vitro study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020; 25 (3): 31—38. PMID: 32844970
  24. Madaparambil V., Antony V., Menon V., Nayaz M., Jasim G.R.M. Effect of adhesion boosters on the shear bond strength of new brackets bonded to a debonded tooth surface an in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2020; 11 (1): 46—50. PMID: 33110308
  25. Martalia C., Anggitia C., Hamid T., Sjamsudin J. The comparison of shear bond strength of metal orthodontics bracket to porcelain surface using silane and single bond: An in vitro study. Journal of International Oral Health. 2020; 12 (5): 470—475. DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_52_20
  26. Nabawy Y.A., Yousry T.N., El-Harouni N.M. Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel pretreated with Er, Cr: YSGG laser and CPP-ACP. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21 (1): 306. PMID: 34126965
  27. Jungbauer R., Proff P., Edelhoff D., Stawarczyk B. Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets. Sci Rep. 2022; 12 (1): 8514. PMID: 35595815
  28. Singh S., Heeral M., Chiranjeev S., Renuka B., Shantanu S., Akanksha J. Assessment of the effect of adhesion boosters on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets on bleached teeth. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022; 6 (S1): 617—622. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.4811
  29. Prylińska-Czyżewska A., Maciejewska-Szaniec Z., Olszewska A., Polichnowska M., Grabarek B.O., Dudek D., Sobański D., Czajka-Jakubowska A. Comparison of bond strength of orthodontic brackets onto the tooth enamel of 120 freshly extracted adult bovine medial lower incisors using 4 adhesives: A resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive, a composite adhesive, a liquid composite adhesive, and a one-step light-cured adhesive. Med Sci Monit. 2022; 28: e938867. PMID: 36540003
  30. Hadrous R., Bouserhal J., Osman E. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2019; 17 (3): 461—468. PMID: 31278045

Downloads

Received

June 17, 2023

Accepted

August 11, 2023

Published on

September 24, 2023