DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_1_91

Evaluation of orthodontic treatment methods for children with congenital facial cleft

Downloads

Authors

  • M.A. Postnikov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Therapeutic dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2232-8870
  • N.A. Vorozheikina 1, assistant at the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
  • A.N. Karpov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
  • O.A. Magsumova 1, assistant at the Therapeutic dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0511-6550
  • M.I. Sadykov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Prosthodontics Department
  • A.S. Seryogin 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8566-1638
  • N.V. Pankratova 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0672-1381
  • G.V. Stepanov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
  • Z.K. Yakubova 3, PhD in Medical Sciences, professor of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6427-7680
  • 1 Samara State Medical University, 443001, Samara, Russia
  • 2 Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia
  • 3 Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, 734003, Dushanbe, Tajikistan

Abstract

The article describes the results of the examination of patients aged 7 to 12 years who are registered at the dispensary and have undergone hardware orthodontic treatment for maxillofacial anomalies resulting from congenital clefts of the upper lip and palate. At the same time, one group of patients received hardware treatment by the methods developed by the authors, and the other — by conventional methods. The survey was conducted by means of a questionnaire developed by the authors. The purpose of the work is to determine by means of a questionnaire the practical possibility of using new schemes of hardware orthodontic treatment developed by the authors.
Materials and methods.
The respondents answering the questions of the questionnaire developed by us were patients aged 7 to 12 years who underwent hardware orthodontic treatment for anomalies in the position of teeth and occlusion resulting from congenital cleft of the upper lip and palate and after plastic surgery. The respondents answering the questions of the questionnaire developed by us were patients aged 7 to 12 years who underwent hardware orthodontic treatment for anomalies in the position of teeth and occlusion resulting from congenital cleft of the upper lip and palate and after plastic surgery. Filling out the questionnaire was carried out by the child independently in the presence and with the consent of the parents.
Results.
Analysis of the survey results showed that most children with the consequences of congenital pathology are able to clearly formulate the purpose of orthodontic treatment, want to correct the incorrect position of the teeth and can responsibly follow the recommendations of an orthodontist.
Conclusions.
The practical possibility of orthodontic treatment of the considered contingent of patients with the use of new methods of hardware treatment developed by the authors with two removable devices on both jaws at the same time was confirmed.

Key words:

consequences of congenital cleft of the upper lip and palate, hardware orthodontic treatment, questionnaire

For Citation

[1]
Postnikov M.A., Vorozheikina N.A., Karpov A.N., Magsumova O.A., Sadykov M.I., Seryogin A.S., Pankratova N.V., Stepanov G.V., Yakubova Z.K. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment methods for children with congenital facial cleft. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (1): 91—97. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_1_91

References

  1. Persin L.S. Orthodontics. National Guide. Vol. 1: Diagnosis of dental anomalies. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2020. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Inoyatov A.Sh., Zamonova G.Sh. Problem of congenital defects of maxillofacial area at children. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Achievements and Innovations in Science, Technology and Medicine”. Penza, 2016. P. 58—60 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 26371892.
  3. Chiu Y.T., Liao Y.F., Chen P.K. Initial cleft severity and maxillary growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140 (2): 189—95. PMID: 21803256
  4. Saperstein E.L., Kennedy D.L., Mulliken J.B., Padwa B.L. Facial growth in children with complete cleft of the primary palate and intact secondary palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70 (1): e66—71. PMID: 22182663
  5. Morén S., Mani M., Lilian S., Lindestad P.Å., Holmström M. Speech in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Long-Term Follow-Up After One- or Two-Stage Palate Repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017; 54 (6): 639—649. PMID: 28140670
  6. Reddy R.R., Gosla Reddy S., Vaidhyanathan A., Bergé S.J., Kuijpers-Jagtman A.M. Maxillofacial growth and speech outcome after one-stage or two-stage palatoplasty in unilateral cleft lip and palate. A systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017; 45 (6): 995—1003. PMID: 28427835
  7. Tengroth B., Hederstierna C., Neovius E., Flynn T. Hearing thresholds and ventilation tube treatment in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 97: 102—108. PMID: 28483218
  8. Hanai U., Akamatsu T., Sakata N., Niikura R., Muramatsu H., Okawa T., Sakuma Y. Speech Outcomes of 10-year-old Children after Early Palatoplasty Using Presurgical Orthodontics at 6 Months of Age. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2018; 43 (4): 168—172. PMID: 30488405
  9. Inoyatov A.Sh., Mukimov I.I., Gafarova S.U. The clinical characteristic of children with congenital defects of maxillofacial area. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk Region Council of Young Scientists and Specialists. 2016; 2 (13): 11—14 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 26224593
  10. Davydov B.N., Domenyuk D.A., Dmitrienko S.V., Korobkeev A.A., Arutyunova A.G. Morphological peculiarities of facial skelet structure and clinical and diagnostic approaches to the treatment of dental anomalies in children in the period of early change. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2019; 1 (69): 26—38 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 37786895
  11. Antoszewski B., Fijałkowska M. Distribution of lip and/or palate clefts types among children form Lodz during years 1981—2015. Pol Przegl Chir. 2018; 90 (3): 1—6. PMID: 30015318
  12. Korolenkova M.V., Starikova N.V., Ageeva L.V. Risk factors for teeth aplasia and hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate children. Stomatology. 2016; 1: 59—62 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 25675498
  13. Eslami N., Majidi M.R., Aliakbarian M., Hasanzadeh N. Prevalence of dental anomalies in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24 (5): 1695—8. PMID: 24036756
  14. López-Giménez A., Silvestre-Rangil J., Silvestre F.J., Paredes-Gallardo V. Tooth agenesis code (TAC) in complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Odontology. 2018; 106 (3): 257—265. PMID: 29243181
  15. Rullo R., Festa V.M., Rullo R., Addabbo F., Chiodini P., Vitale M., Perillo L. Prevalence of dental anomalies in children with cleft lip and unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015; 16 (3): 229—32. PMID: 26418927
  16. Bimbas E., Blohina S., Menshikova E., Ershova O. Application of modern technologies in complex rehabilitation with congenital cleft of upper lip, alveolar ridge and palate. Actual Problems in Dentistry. 2018; 4: 71—76 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 36777711
  17. Danilova M.A., Alexandrova L.I. Quality of life in children with cleft lip and palate. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2018; 3 (66): 54—57 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 36347137
  18. Fomenko I.V., Filimonova E.V., Kasatkina A.L., Kraevskaya N.S. Comparative characteristics of the quality of life of individuals with congenital unilateral cleft lip and palate, depending on the method of palatoplasty on the result of questionnaires of their parents. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2016; 1 (56): 20—22 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 25654525
  19. Starikova N.V., Nadtochiy A.G., Udalova N.V., Sobolev I.V. Orthodontic treatment for patients with cleft lip and palate, taking into account the structural features of the language. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 1: 38—40 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 21348072
  20. Arsenina O.I., Malashenkova E.I., Pashchenko S.A. Algorithm of orthodontic treatment of cleft lip and palate patients before and after autogenous bone grafting. Stomatology. 2017; 5: 62—65 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 30309745
  21. Gatalsky V.V. Algorithm of orthodontic rehabilitation of children with cleft lip and palate in “The Minsk Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital”. Orthodontics. 2012; 2 (58): 47—49 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22507536
  22. Dudnik O.V., Mamedov Ad.A., Zubkov A.V. Orthodontic treatment for children with cleft lip and palate during the period of permanent bite. Medical and pharmaceutical journal Pulse. 2020; 5: 39—43 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 42805419
  23. Oliveira D.D., Bartolomeo F.U., Cardinal L., Figueiredo D.S., Palomo J.M., Andrade I. Jr An alternative clinical approach to achieve greater anterior than posterior maxillary expansion in cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25 (6): e523—6. PMID: 25347603
  24. Toro-Ibacache V., Cortés Araya J., Díaz Muñoz A., Manríquez Soto G. Morphologic variability of nonsyndromic operated patients affected by cleft lip and palate: a geometric morphometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146 (3): 346—54. PMID: 25172257
  25. Shcheglova A.P., Zakharova N.I., Danilova M.A., Alexandrova L.I., Malimon T.V. Dental components of the quality of life of children with congenital cleft lip and palate. In: proceedings of “Topical issues of medicine. Innovative technologies in surgery” conference. Perm, 2018. Pp. 153—56. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 37059630.
  26. Fomenko I.V., Kraevskaya N.S., Vologina M.V., Kasatkina A.L. Psychological state and self-esteem in children with congenital unilateral cleft lip and palate. Vestnik VSMU. 2016; 1 (57): 91—93 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 25726918
  27. Postnikov M.A. The influence of dental status on the quality of life of patients before and after orthodontic tearment of malocclucion Class III. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2016; 1 (56): 53—57 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 25654533
  28. Abreu L.G. Orthodontics in Children and Impact of Malocclusion on Adolescents’ Quality of Life. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018; 65 (5): 995—1006. PMID: 30213359
  29. Semenov M.G., Vinokur V.A., Kovalenko K.U. Quality of life in adult patients with cleft lip and pallet after surgery. The Dental Institute. 2017; 4 (77): 44—45 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 32302011
  30. Ishmumtova A., Postnikov M. Modernmethods of research the quality of life amongst children with dentoalveolarand maxillofacial anomalies at the stages of orthodontic treatment. Stomatologičeskij žurnal. 2016; 3: 53—59 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41716715
  31. Postnikov M.A., Vorozheykina N.A., Karpov A.N., Seryogin A.S. Rehabilitation problem of patients with congenital cleft lip and palate in Samara Region. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2019; 1 (69): 15—20 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 37786892
  32. Vorozheykina N.A., Postnikov M.A., Karpov A.N. Improving the medical rehabilitation of children with the consequences of congenital unilateral clefts of the upper lip and palate at the stages of orthodontic treatment. Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya. 2020; 5—6: 76—80 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 47111859
  33. Postnikov M.A., Korchagina M.S., Tkach T.M., Shukhorova Yu.A., Magsumova O.A., Burda G.K., Simanovskaya O.E. Analysis of means and methods of endodontic treatment in dental organizations according to the data of a survey of dentists of the Samara region (Russia). Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2021; 2: 122—129 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 46322612

Downloads

Received

November 14, 2021

Accepted

February 27, 2022

Published on

March 1, 2022