DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_4_150

Stress-deformed state of a non-removable prosthesis on implants in the process of cementing, depending on the angle of the abutment walls

Authors

  • S.I. Abakarov 1, Russian Academy of Science corresponding member, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Prosthodontics and general dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2369-3527
  • D.V. Sorokin 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, professor of the Prosthodontics and general dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2043-2874
  • V.Yu. Lapushko 1, postgraduate at the Prosthodontics and general dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6539-3405
  • S.S. Abakarova 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of the Prosthodontics and general dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9483-6092
  • 1 Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, 125993, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of implant-supported fixed dentures, a number of issues related to their manufacture remain debatable. Many authors raise the question of the necessary degree of inclination of the abutment walls to improve the passive fit and stability of the prosthesis, which determined the relevance and aim of this publication. >. A study of the stress-strain state of the components of a fixed prosthesis during cementation on an abutment (ceramic veneer, frame, cement, abutment) was carried out using the finite element method, depending on the design of the fixed prosthesis, the height and angle of inclination of the abutment walls. A total of 99 models were studied and analyzed. >. The analysis of the obtained results showed that during cementation there are residual stresses in the components of the structure of a fixed prosthesis (metal-ceramic crown). Thus, in ceramic lining, residual stresses occur mainly in the cervical region and increase as the angle of inclination of the abutment walls decreases to 0° and reach maximum values with a fixed prosthesis on a single support — 7.88 MPa, on two supports — 10.34 MPa, and on three supports — 13.12 MPa (p≤0.05). With an increased diameter of the abutment support of 6 mm, the values of the stress-strain state are lower by 14.3% at all angles of inclination of the walls of the abutments (p≤0.05), in contrast to the values of the stress-strain state with an abutment with a diameter in the cervical region 4.5 mm. Also as the angle of inclination of the abutments decreases, there is increase in the stress-strain state in the metal frame in the cervical area and reach maximum values with a fixed prosthesis on a single support — 12.26 MPa, on two supports — 12.94 MPa, on three supports — 13.36 MPa (p≤0.05). >. The study of the stress-strain state of the abutments showed a surge of residual stresses in their upper part of a fixed prosthesis on a single support, on two supports, on three supports, reaching the highest values with an increase in the angle of inclination of its walls and the height of the abutment. So, already at a height of 7 mm and 8°, the obtained values (39.25 MPa) are 2.7 times higher than with an abutment with a height of 3 mm and a wall inclination angle of 10° (14.45 MPa; p≤0.05). It has been established that the height and angle of inclination of the abutment walls affect the uneven distribution of stresses in the ceramic veneer, framework, cement layer and abutment.

Key words:

mathematical modeling, abutment, fixed dentures on implants, wall inclination angle, convergence, stress-strain state of the crown

For Citation

[1]
Abakarov S.I., Sorokin D.V., Lapushko V.Yu., Abakarova S.S. Stress-deformed state of a non-removable prosthesis on implants in the process of cementing, depending on the angle of the abutment walls. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (4): 150—158. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_4_150

References

  1. Proos K.A., Swain M.V., Ironside J., Steven G.P. Influence of margin design and taper abutment angle on a restored crown of a first premolar using finite element analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16 (4): 442—9. PMID: 12956502
  2. Bernal G., Okamura M., Muñoz C.A. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont. 2003; 12 (2): 111—5. PMID: 12964683
  3. Ayad M.F., Maghrabi A.A., Rosenstiel S.F. Assessment of convergence angles of tooth preparations for complete crowns among dental students. J Dent. 2005; 33 (8): 633—8. PMID: 16139694
  4. Karl M., Taylor T.D., Wichmann M.G., Heckmann S.M. In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs. J Prosthodont. 2006; 15 (1): 20—4. PMID: 16433647
  5. Lee M.Y., Heo S.J., Park E.J., Park J.M. Comparative study on stress distribution around internal tapered connection implants according to fit of cement- and screw-retained prostheses. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5 (3): 312—8. PMID: 24049573
  6. Covey D.A., Kent D.K., et al. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83 (3): 344—8. PMID: 10709044
  7. Bresciano M., Schierano G., et al. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16 (5): 594—8. PMID: 16164467
  8. Abbo B., Razzoog M.E., et al. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99 (1): 25—9. PMID: 18182182
  9. Iwai T., Komine F., Kobayashi K., Saito A., Matsumura H. Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008; 66 (4): 214—8. PMID: 18607834
  10. Chaar M.S., Att W., Strub J.R. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38 (9): 697—711. PMID: 21395638
  11. Ali A.O., Kelly J.R., Zandparsa R. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21 (8): 614—21. PMID: 22823334
  12. Rödiger M., Rinke S., et al. Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6 (3): 233—40. PMID: 25006388
  13. Yoon S.S., Cheong C., Preisser J. Jr, Jun S., Chang B.M., Wright R.F. Measurement of total occlusal convergence of 3 different tooth preparations in 4 different planes by dental students. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112 (2): 285—92. PMID: 24726595
  14. Rodriguez L.C., Saba J.N., Meyer C.A., Chung K.H., Wadhwani C., Rodrigues D.C. A finite element analysis of novel vented dental abutment geometries for cement-retained crown restorations. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016; 2 (2): 136—145. PMID: 29744160
  15. Safari S., Hosseini Ghavam F., Amini P., Yaghmaei K. Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018; 10 (1): 1—7. PMID: 29503708
  16. Beuer F., Edelhoff D., Gernet W., Naumann M. Effect of preparation angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM system. Dent Mater J. 2008; 27 (6): 814—20. PMID: 19241690
  17. Tiu J., Al-Amleh B., Waddell J.N., Duncan W.J. Clinical tooth preparations and associated measuring methods: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113 (3): 175—84. PMID: 25449611
  18. Choi K.H., Son K., Lee D.H., Lee K.B. Influence of abutment height and convergence angle on the retrievability of cement-retained implant prostheses with a lingual slot. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018; 10 (5): 381—387. PMID: 30370030
  19. Zhao L., Weigl P., Wu Y., Xu Y. In vitro study of bond strength between abutments with different degrees of convergence and crowns by pre-bonding method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019; 34 (1): 25—30. PMID: 30695084
  20. Schriwer C., Gjerdet N.R., Arola D., Øilo M. The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns. Dent Mater. 2021; 37 (8): e427-e434. PMID: 33910755
  21. Lin S., Shi S., LeGeros R.Z., LeGeros J.P. Three-dimensional finite element analyses of four designs of a high-strength silicon nitride implant. Implant Dent. 2000; 9 (1): 53—60. PMID: 11307234
  22. Stegaroiu R., Khraisat A., Nomura S., Miyakawa O. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19 (5): 735—42. PMID: 15508991
  23. Cicciu M., Bramanti E., Matacena G., Guglielmino E., Risitano G. FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014; 7 (4): 817—25. PMID: 24955150
  24. Sim B.K., Kim B., Kim M.J., Jeong G.H., Ju K.W., Shin Y.J., Kim M.Y., Lee J.H. Hollow abutment screw design for easy retrieval in case of screw fracture in dental implant system. J Healthc Eng. 2017; 2017: 4842072. PMID: 29065610
  25. Olesova V., Uzunyan N.A., Shmatov K.V., Zaslavskij R.S. Mathematical prediction of the strength of the root of a tooth with a cast pin insert. Kremlin Medicine Journal. 2018; 2: 104—106 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 35077040
  26. Singh N.K., Chalapathy S.B., Thota R.P., Chakravarthula K., Tirnati R., Yenugupalli K. Evaluation of stress distribution among two different pre-angled abutments of implants in two different densities of bone at different levels along the implant In vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19 (11): 1370—1375. PMID: 30602643
  27. Macedo J.P., Pereira J., Faria J., Souza J.C.M., Alves J.L., López-López J., Henriques B. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018; 21 (12): 655—662. PMID: 30693810
  28. Li Z., Gao S., Chen H., Ma R., Wu T., Yu H. Micromotion of implant-abutment interfaces (IAI) after loading: correlation of finite element analysis with in vitro performances. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019; 57 (5): 1133—1144. PMID: 30656596
  29. Cervino G., Romeo U., et al. Fem and von Mises analysis of OSSTEM® dental implant structural components: Evaluation of different direction dynamic loads. Open Dent J. 2018; 12: 219—229. PMID: 29682092
  30. Poyurovskaya I.Ya. Dental materials science: textbook. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2008. 192 p. (In Russ.).

Received

August 10, 2022

Accepted

November 10, 2022

Published on

December 21, 2022