DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_84

Characteristics of dense intraosseous inclusions found in patients during routine dental examination according to cone-beam computed tomography

Downloads

Authors

  • L.K. Abrahamyan 1, postgraduate at the Surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1719-4377
  • A.M. Tsitsiashvili 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4737-8508
  • A.M. Panin 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Maxillofacial surgery Departmen
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6073-1591
  • D.A. Lezhnev 1, 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Radiology Department; professor of the Therapeutic dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7163-2553
  • K.G. Gurevich 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the UNESCO Department “A healthy lifestyle is a guarantee of progress”
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7603-6064
  • 1 Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, 125993, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Inclusions that do not correspond to the normal structure may occur in the jaw bones. They may represent areas of increased ossification, formations, neoplasms, fragments or fragments of teeth, filling materials, broken tools. Such objects are found, as a rule, by a dentist accidentally, during a clinical and radiological examination of the patient. In part, this is due to the lack of clinical manifestations. Some of these objects have a typical scialogical picture, but this does not always allow them to be verified with sufficient accuracy, to give an objective X-ray conclusion, to clarify the indications for invasive diagnostics, for example, trepan biopsy, and, in general, to determine the need for treatment and its scope. An analysis of the scientific literature has shown insufficient information about the characteristics of dense intraosseous inclusions and the preferred management tactics of these patients, despite the fact that they occur in our daily work. . 5008 CBCT patients of both sexes, aged from 16 to 93 years for 2010-2015 were studied. The location of intraosseous inclusions (segment, department, areas of teeth) was evaluated, their X-ray density, size, distance from the nearest anatomical structures and bone surface were measured. . The detected inclusions were on average the size of 4.7×3.7×3.4 (3.5-6.4×2.5-5.4×2.6-4.5) mm; most often, in 68.4% of cases, they were found on the lower jaw in the lateral sections, in the molar region; they were located at a distance of 0 to 10 mm from adjacent anatomical structures and at a distance of 0 to 5.9 mm from the nearest bone surface. The majority, 77.4%, of inclusions were found in the alveolar process of the upper jaw and the alveolar part of the lower jaw and had a density of 1300 (1188.3-1725) HU. . The presented results provide new knowledge about the characteristic features of dense intraosseous inclusions encountered in daily practice, which will allow assessing the possibility of invasive diagnostics, as well as determining the method and protocol of biopsy.

Key words:

dense inclusions of the jaws, CBCT of the jaws, diseases of the jaw bones

For Citation

[1]
Abrahamyan L.K., Tsitsiashvili A.M., Panin A.M., Lezhnev D.A., Gurevich K.G. Characteristics of dense intraosseous inclusions found in patients during routine dental examination according to cone-beam computed tomography. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (3): 84—88. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_84

References

  1. Petrushin A.L., Tyusova N.N., Nekhoroshkova T.V. Sclerotic osteodysplasias. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2016; 1: 136—150 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 25952945
  2. Issakov J., Flusser G., Kollender Y., Merimsky O., Lifschitz-Mercer B., Meller I. Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for bone and soft tissue tumors. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003; 5 (1): 28—30. PMID: 12592954
  3. Slootweg P.J., Müller H. Differential diagnosis of fibro-osseous jaw lesions. A histological investigation on 30 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1990; 18 (5): 210—4. PMID: 2387909
  4. Van Hoe S., Bladt O., Van Der Steen K., Van den Eynde H. Sclerotic Lesions of the Jaw: A Pictorial Review. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2021; 105 (1): 21. PMID: 33870085
  5. Vanhoenacker F.M., Bosmans F., Vanhoenacker C., Bernaerts A. Imaging of Mixed and Radiopaque Jaw Lesions. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020; 24 (5): 558—569. PMID: 33036043
  6. Araki M., Matsumoto N., Matsumoto K., Ohnishi M., Honda K., Komiyama K. Asymptomatic radiopaque lesions of the jaws: a radiographic study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Sci. 2011; 53 (4): 439—44. PMID: 22167028
  7. Kochergina N.V., Zimina O.G., Molchanov G.V. Complex diagnostics of bone tumors. Journal of N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center RAMS. 2004; 1—2: 38—41 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 9024726
  8. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Petrova G.V. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2015. Moscow: Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, 2017. 250 p. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 29673774
  9. Welker J.A., Henshaw R.M., Jelinek J., Shmookler B.M., Malawer M.M. The percutaneous needle biopsy is safe and recommended in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal masses. Cancer. 2000; 89 (12): 2677—86. PMID: 11135231
  10. Egorenkov V.V., Bit-Sava E.M., Molchanov M.S. Samplingrules of an intake of material FOR A morphological REsEARCH. Practical Oncology. 2017; 4: 336—342 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 32232026
  11. Mendez M., Haas A.N., Rados P.V., Sant’ana M. Filho, Carrard V.C. Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms. Braz Oral Res. 2016; 30 (1): e94. PMID: 27556681
  12. Patel K.J., De Silva H.L., Tong D.C., Love R.M. Concordance between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses of oral mucosal lesions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69 (1): 125—33. PMID: 20971541
  13. Silva B.S.F., Bueno M.R., Yamamoto-Silva F.P., Gomez R.S., Peters O.A., Estrela C. Differential diagnosis and clinical management of periapical radiopaque/hyperdense jaw lesions. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31: e52. PMID: 28678971
  14. Natarajan S., Madhankumar S., Jeyapalan K., Athiban I., Elengkumaran S., Periyakaruppiah K.P. Disto-angular transmigrated impacted mandibular molar with enostosis: A rare intraoral lesion. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015; 7 (Suppl 2): S791—3. PMID: 26538971
  15. Milicevic M. [Mixed radiopaque and radiolucent jaw lesions]. Rev Med Liege. 2017; 72 (3): 151—155 (In French). PMID: 28387493
  16. Bernaerts A., Vanhoenacker F.M., Hintjens J., Chapelle K., Salgado R., De Foer B., De Schepper A.M. Tumors and tumor-like lesions of the jaw mixed and radiopaque lesions. JBR-BTR. 2006; 89 (2): 91—9. PMID: 16729446
  17. Koivisto T., Bowles W.R., Rohrer M. Frequency and distribution of radiolucent jaw lesions: a retrospective analysis of 9,723 cases. J Endod. 2012; 38 (6): 729—32. PMID: 22595103
  18. Jerjes W., Banu B., Swinson B., Hopper C. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia in a young Indian woman. A case report. Br Dent J. 2005; 198 (8): 477—8. PMID: 15849576
  19. Allen C., Nodit L. Diagnostic challenges in fine-needle aspiration of a jaw lesion. Diagn Cytopathol. 2021; 49 (10): 1141—1143. PMID: 34464515
  20. Abrahamyan L.K., Tsitsiashvili A.M., Panin A.M., Lezhnev D.A., Gurevich K.G. Frequency of occurrence of patients with dense intraosseous inclusions of the jaws during dental examination according to cone-beam computed tomography. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2022; 2: 58—62 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 48679076
  21. Panin A.M., Ektov P.V., Tsitsiashvili A.M., Abraamyan L.K., Shekhtman A.P. A new method of guided trephine-biopsy of jaw bone structural changes. Head and Neck. 2021; 3: 72—78 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 46614591

Downloads

Received

June 15, 2022

Accepted

July 15, 2022

Published on

October 30, 2022