DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_54

Recovery assessment of eccentric occlusal lower jaw movements in patients with TMJ disc disorders at the stage of splint therapy

Authors

  • L.V. Dubova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Prosthodontics Department
  • L.V. Korkin 1, postgraduate at the Prosthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7154-2865
  • G.V. Maximov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Prosthodontics Department
  • M.S. Sokolova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Prosthodontics Department
  • 1 Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Improving the effectiveness of the treatment of musculo-articular disfunction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with the implementation of advanced digital technologies is an actual topic due to the increasing incidence of this pathology in modern dental practice. The aim of the study is to study the trajectory and eccentric movements volume of the lower jaw in patients with disc disorders of TMJ. . We conducted a kinesiographic study of eccentric occlusal movements of the lower jaw in 20 patients aged 27 to 58 years with TMJ disc disorders before treatment and after 6 months of wearing an occlusal-stabilizing device. We measured the angle trajectory of laterotrusive and protrusive eccentric movements being relative to the horizon and the volume of these movements of the lower jaw. Occlusion-stabilizing apparatus was modeled and then milled according to the data of intraoral scanning of the jaws and the therapeutic position of the lower jaw found using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. . Before treatment the average angle of the left laterotrusion movement and the volume were 43.7±12.57° and 4.4±1.9 mm, the average angle of the right laterotrusion movement and the volume were 38.6±13.02° and 4.3±2.06 mm, the mean protrusion angle and volume were 36.7±10.44° and 4.4±1.7 mm. After six months of splint therapy the average angle of the left laterotrusive movement and volume were 43.3±3.57° and 7.3±0.37 mm, the mean angle of the right laterotrusive movement and volume were 42.1±3.86° and 7.2±0.56 mm, the mean angle of the protrusion movement and volume were 44.3±4.16° and 7.1±0.8 mm. . Using an occlusion-stabilizing device at the stage of splint therapy in patients with TMJ disc disorders such indicators as an increase in the volume and a decrease in the spread from minimum to maximum values of the angular indicators of laterotrusive and protrusive movements improved after 6 months. The average values of the angular indicators and the volume of laterotrusive and protrusive movements approached those of patients without TMJ pathology and the intact dentition that indicates the effectiveness of the using an occlusal-stabilizing apparatus.

Key words:

kinesiography, temporomandibular joint, eccentric movements of the lower jaw, splint therapy, virtual articulator

For Citation

[1]
Dubova L.V., Korkin L.V., Maximov G.V., Sokolova M.S. Recovery assessment of eccentric occlusal lower jaw movements in patients with TMJ disc disorders at the stage of splint therapy. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (3): 54—59. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_54

References

  1. Dubova L.V., Melnik A.S., Stupnikov A.A., Savelyev V.V. The study of the masticatory muscles’ bioelectric potentials and the lower jaw movements in patients with functional-diagnostic system. Dental Forum. 2016; 4: 27—28 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 27300207
  2. Dubova L., Melnik A., Stupnikov A., Savelyev V. Method of using kineziography in patients with TMJ pathology at the stage of the occlusal tires. Cathedra. Dental education. 2016; 58: 42—44 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 30039598
  3. Sato S., Nasu F., Motegi K. Analysis of kinesiograph recordings and masticatory efficiency after treatment of non-reducing disk displacement of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30 (7): 708—13. PMID: 12791156
  4. Gonçalves D.A., Dal Fabbro A.L., Campos J.A., Bigal M.E., Speciali J.G. Symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in the population: an epidemiological study. J Orofac Pain. 2010; 24 (3): 270—8. PMID: 20664828
  5. Suvinen T.I., Reade P.C., Kemppainen P., Könönen M., Dworkin S.F. Review of aetiological concepts of temporomandibular pain disorders: towards a biopsychosocial model for integration of physical disorder factors with psychological and psychosocial illness impact factors. Eur J Pain. 2005; 9 (6): 613—33. PMID: 15978854
  6. Kihara H., Hatakeyama W., Komine F., Takafuji K., Takahashi T., Yokota J., Oriso K., Kondo H. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020; 64 (2): 109—113. PMID: 31474576
  7. Kernen F., Schlager S., Seidel Alvarez V., Mehrhof J., Vach K., Kohal R., Nelson K., Flügge T. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; S0022—3913 (21)00145—1 (Online ahead of print). PMID: 33902891
  8. Conejo J., Dayo A.F., Syed A.Z., Mupparapu M. The Digital Clone: Intraoral Scanning, Face Scans and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. Dent Clin North Am. 2021; 65 (3): 529—553. PMID: 34051929
  9. Costantinides F., Parisi S., Tonni I., Bodin C., Vettori E., Perinetti G., Di Lenarda R. Reliability of kinesiography vs magnetic resonance in internal derangement of TMJ diagnosis: A systematic review of the literature. Cranio. 2020; 38 (1): 58—65. PMID: 29629642
  10. Ueki K., Moroi A., Takayama A., Tsutsui T., Saito Y., Yoshizawa K. Evaluation of border movement of the mandible before and after orthognathic surgery using a kinesiograph. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48 (5): 477—482. PMID: 32229178
  11. Cooper B.C., Adib F. An assessment of the usefulness of Kinesiograph as an aid in the diagnosis of TMD: a review of Manfredini et al.’s studies. Cranio. 2015; 33 (1): 46—66. PMID: 25115950
  12. Antonik M.M. Computer technologies for complex diagnostics and treatment of patients with pathology of occlusion of the dentition, complicated by muscular-articular dysfunction: dissertation abstract. Moscow: Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 2012. 43 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Ivanenko T.A., Klimova T.V., Nabiev N.V., Postnikov M.A., Rusanova A.G., Persin L.S. Mandible movements assessment in adult patients by means of the kinesiographic method. Orthodontics. 2018; 4 (84): 2—13 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41357950
  14. Persin L.S., Zayceva M.V., Debelaya A.N. Evaluation of kinesiography in patients with an inclination of the occlusal plane with crossbite. International Dental Review. 2019; 4 (89): 40—45 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41510290
  15. Carneiro Pereira A.L., Bezerra de Medeiros A.K., de Sousa Santos K., Oliveira de Almeida É., Seabra Barbosa G.A., da Fonte Porto Carreiro A. Accuracy of CAD-CAM systems for removable partial denture framework fabrication: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125 (2): 241—248. PMID: 32147252
  16. Arnold C., Hey J., Schweyen R., Setz J.M. Accuracy of CAD-CAM-fabricated removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119 (4): 586—592. PMID: 28709674
  17. Raszewski Z. Acrylic resins in the CAD/CAM technology: A systematic literature review. Dent Med Probl. 2020; 57 (4): 449—454. PMID: 33444491
  18. Marcel R., Reinhard H., Andreas K. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated bite splints: milling vs 3D printing. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 24 (12): 4607—4615. PMID: 32436163
  19. Kalberer N., Mehl A., Schimmel M., Müller F., Srinivasan M. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121 (4): 637—643. PMID: 30711292
  20. Li L., Sun Y., Wang Y., Li W., Dai N., Tian S., Cui H. Accuracy of a novel virtual articulator for recording three-dimensional dentition. Int J Prosthodont. 2020; 33 (4): 441—451. PMID: 32639704
  21. Park J.H., Lee G.H., Moon D.N., Kim J.C., Park M., Lee K.M. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125 (6): 849—853. PMID: 32624222
  22. Antonik M.M. A virtual-real method for diagnostics, planning, and orthopedic treatment of the patients with occlusal disorders complicated by musculoarticular dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2012; 1: 17—21 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 18112385
  23. Reicheneder C.A., Proff P., Baumert U., Gedrange T. Growth-related differences in maximum laterotrusion and retrusion between children and adults. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79 (2): 265—70. PMID: 19216588
  24. Lepidi L., Galli M., Mastrangelo F., Venezia P., Joda T., Wang H.L., Li J. Virtual Articulators and Virtual Mounting Procedures: Where Do We Stand? J Prosthodont. 2021; 30 (1): 24—35. PMID: 32827222
  25. Costa A.L.F., Castilho Fardim K.A., de Almeida B.M., Gomes J.P.P., Braz-Silva P.H., Dieguez F.L., Cardoso C.A.B., Araki A.T., de Castro Lopes S.L.P. Eccentric movements of temporomandibular joint and upper airway volume: Three-dimensional segmentation using cone beam computed tomography. Cranio. 2021; Mar 10: 1—8. PMID: 33719936
  26. Chuhuaicura P., Lezcano M.F., Dias F.J., Fuentes A.D., Arias A., Fuentes R. Mandibular border movements: The two envelopes of motion. J Oral Rehabil. 2021; 48 (4): 384—391. PMID: 33151578

Received

July 5, 2022

Accepted

July 16, 2022

Published on

October 30, 2022