DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_38

Existing methods of maintaining the well of a removed tooth for delayed installation of a dental implant (review)

Downloads

Authors

  • S.B. Mokhnacheva 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor and head of the Surgical Dentistry and Maxillofacial surgery Department
  • N.I. Vasiliev 1, postgraduate at the Surgical Dentistry and Maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5630-0182
  • 1 Izhevsk State Medical Academy, 426034, Izhevsk, Russia

Abstract

The need for maximum preservation of the volume and quality of tissues after tooth extraction is obvious for a predictable delayed installation of a dental implant. To date, there are, advertised and sanctified by literature, many ways of reserving holes of extracted teeth, differing in their effectiveness, cost and level of commitment to them by specialists. The article discusses the existing methods of preserving alveolar tissues after tooth extraction surgery with an analysis of three parameters: predictability, ease of implementation and economic feasibility. Many existing techniques for reserving the hole of a removed tooth are used in practice to varying degrees of prevalence. The choice of the method by the operator often depends on three main indicators: the predictability of the expected result, ease of implementation and economic feasibility. The purpose of this literature review is to highlight the methods in the context of these three main indicators: predictability, ease of implementation, economic feasibility. The article analyzes publications in scientific publications over the last five years or more (PubMed, Medline, eLibrary). . The factor of unpredictability of the clinical result and possible complications most of all repels operators from using special techniques for reserving the hole of a removed tooth before the delayed installation of a dental implant. A more detailed study of the results, their analysis and clarification of indications in the future will be able to determine the technique as more or less effective, which will affect the popularity of its use. The described current situation of the issue of maintaining the hole of the removed tooth for the subsequent delayed installation of the dental implant in order to prevent atrophy pushes clinicians to search for inexpensive and simple methods with a greater probability of not leading to complications and increasing the preparation time for the implant installation. The relevance of this problem increases with the popularity of the dental implantation technique for replacing a lost tooth and the growing cost of this method.

Key words:

tooth extraction, hole reservation, implant, prevention of atrophy, tissue volume

For Citation

[1]
Mokhnacheva S.B., Vasiliev N.I. Existing methods of maintaining the well of a removed tooth for delayed installation of a dental implant (review). Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (3): 38—46. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_38

References

  1. Seyssens L., De Lat L., Cosyn J. Immediate implant placement with or without connective tissue graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2021; 48 (2): 284—301. PMID: 33125754
  2. Markova G.B., Alishlalov SaidA. Influence of keratinized gingiva on bone remodulation around the implants. Russian Bulletin of Dental Implantology. 2020; 3—4 (49—50): 55—58 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 46305983
  3. Shchetinin E.V., Sirak S.V., Khodzhayan A.B., Radzievskaya N.G., Petrosyan G.G. Pathophysiological aspects of regeneration of the alveolar socket of the extracted tooth in experiment. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2014; 3: 262—265 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22702646
  4. Beniashvili R.M., Kulakov A.A., Gurin A.N., Grigoryants L.A., Komlev V.S., Semkin V.A. Gingival and bone grafting in dental implantology. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2017. 5—12 p (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 26551474
  5. Leonova L.E., Pavlova G.A., Popov A.V. Athrophy degree of alveolar vestibular plate at early and late terms after tooth extraction. Perm Medical Journal. 2015; 5: 52—56 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 24416136
  6. Leonova L.E., Pavlova G.A., Pershina R.G., Balueva N.M., Popov A.V. Comparative clinico-roentgenological and functional assessment of alveolar bone regeneration in molar sockets region in the nearest postoperative period. Perm Medical Journal. 2016; 3: 50—55 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 26236069
  7. Avila-Ortiz G., Chambrone L., Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46 Suppl 21: 195—223. PMID: 30623987
  8. Barootchi S., Wang H.L., Ravida A., Ben Amor F., Riccitiello F., Rengo C., Paz A., Laino L., Marenzi G., Gasparro R., Sammartino G. Ridge preservation techniques to avoid invasive bone reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group C. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019; 12 (4): 399—416. PMID: 31781696
  9. Lomakin M.V., Soloshchanskii I.I., Pokhabov A.A., Bisultanov H.U. Method for quantitative assessment of surgical wound healing (for example, the hole of a removed tooth). Part I. Parodontologiya. 2020; 4: 349—356 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 44383632
  10. Cardaropoli D., Tamagnone L., Roffredo A., Gaveglio L., Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32 (4): 421—30. PMID: 22577648
  11. Red’ko NikolayA., Drobyshev AlekseyYu., Lezhnev DmitryA. Socket Preservation During Preimplantation Period: Effi cacy of Osteoplastic Material Application Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2019; 6: 70—79 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41504339
  12. Zuhr O., Hürzeler M. Plastic-esthetic periodontal and implant surgery. A microsurgical approach. Quintessence, 2012. P. 848 (In Russ.).
  13. Amler M.H. The time sequence of tissue regeneration in human extraction wounds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969; 27 (3): 309—18. PMID: 5251474
  14. Araújo M.G., Sukekava F., Wennström J.L., Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32 (6): 645—52. PMID: 15882225
  15. Araújo M.G., Wennström J.L., Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17 (6): 606—14. PMID: 17092217
  16. Perussolo J., Souza A.B., Matarazzo F., Oliveira R.P., Araújo M.G. Influence of the keratinized mucosa on the stability of peri-implant tissues and brushing discomfort: A 4-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 (12): 1177—1185. PMID: 30346630
  17. Shevela T.L., Pohodenko-Chudakova I.O. Prognosis of implantological treatment taking into account the structure of soft tissues surrounding the dental implant. Dentist (Minsk). 2022; 2 (45): 27—30 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 48548066
  18. Thoma D.S., Naenni N., Figuero E., Hämmerle C.H.F., Schwarz F., Jung R.E., Sanz-Sánchez I. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 Suppl 15: 32—49. PMID: 29498129
  19. Thoma D.S., Naenni N., Figuero E., Hämmerle C.H.F., Schwarz F., Jung R.E., Sanz-Sánchez I. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 Suppl 15: 32—49. PMID: 29498129
  20. Semenova Yu.A. Development, experimental and clinical study of a new osteoplastic material based on a bone mineral component: master’s thesis abstract. Moscow, 2018 24 p (In Russ.).
  21. Lykoshin D.D., Zaitsev V.V., Kostromina M.A., Esipov R.S. New-generation osteoplastic materials based on biological and synthetic matrices. Fine Chemical Technologies. 2021; 1: 36—54 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 45615554
  22. Elgali I., Omar O., Dahlin C., Thomsen P. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017; 125 (5): 315—337. PMID: 28833567
  23. Ruzin I.A., Bozo I.Ya., Drobyshev A.Yu., Deev R.V. Use of gen-activated osteoplastic materials for bone regeneration. Smolensk Medical Almanac. 2018; 2: 93—94 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 35256418
  24. Tatsuhiro F., Seiko T., Yusuke T., Reiko T.T., Kazuhito S. Dental pulp stem cell-derived, scaffold-free constructs for bone regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19 (7): E1846. PMID: 29932167
  25. Amantayev B.A., Kobekov S.S. Analysis and characteristic of bone-substitute materials used in surgical treatment of bone jaws defects. Bulletin of the Kazakh National Medical University. 2019; 1: 126—129 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 39394414
  26. Boyko E.M., Brusnitsin D.A., Dolgalev A.A., Zelensky V.A. Minimally invasive method of guided bone regeneration of alveolar ridge. Medical alphabet. 2017; 1 (298): 5—9 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 29426434
  27. Ivaschenko A.V., Yablokov A.E., Arkhipov V.D., Fedyaev I.M., Arkhipov V.Ya., Tlustenko V.P. Organ-saving technologies as an alternative to dental implantation. Vestnik VSMU. 2019; 3 (71): 51—54 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41104146
  28. Walter M.H., Rädel M. [Utilization and expenses in dental care: An overview based on routine data from Germany]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021; 64 (8): 993—1000 (In German). PMID: 34223916
  29. Moiseeva N.S., Kharitonov D.Yu., Kharitonov I.D., Stepanov I.V., Podoprigora A.V. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of morphological parameters in osteoplastic materials used in alveolar bone augmentation. Journal of New Medical Technologies, EEdition. 2021; 4: 18—23 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 46518708
  30. Krapivin E.V., Fadeev R.A. Analysis of postextraction alveolar bone regeneration after 3 months of tooth removal when using immediat-prostheses and without thier applying. The Dental Institute. 2017; 3 (76): 84—85 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 30486740
  31. Romanenko A.A., Chuev V.V., Buzov A.A., Chuev V.P. Clinical-laboratory evaluation of osteoplastic material Klipdent. A review. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2020; 3 (95): 93—99 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 44008074
  32. Canullo L., Del Fabbro M., Khijmatgar S., Panda S., Ravidà A., Tommasato G., Sculean A., Pesce P. Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26 (1): 141—158. PMID: 34826029
  33. Kumar K., Singh R., Mugal V., Dhingra N., Priyadarshni P., Bandgar S. Preservation of Alveolar Ridge using Graft Material after Tooth Extraction: A Clinical Trial. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021; 13 (Suppl 1): S456-S460. PMID: 34447133
  34. Horowitz R., Holtzclaw D., Rosen P.S. A review on alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012; 12 (3 Suppl): 149—60. PMID: 23040345
  35. Trunin D., Tlustenko V., Sadykov M., Nesterov A., Postnikov M., Tugushev R. X-ray monitoring of lunatic regeneration remote tooth (experimental study). Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018; 2 (82): 154—159 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 35289346
  36. Mikhailovsky A.A. Preservation of the volume of bone tissue of the jaw during tooth extraction: master’s thesis abstract. Moscow, 2015. 27 p (In Russ.).
  37. Santana R., Gyurko R., Kanasi E., Xu W.P., Dibart S. Synthetic polymeric barrier membrane associated with blood coagulum, human allograft, or bovine bone substitute for ridge preservation: a randomized, controlled, clinical and histological trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 48 (5): 675—683. PMID: 31014520
  38. Ovcharenko N., Greenwell H., Katwal D., Patel A., Hill M., Shumway B., Cockerham B.L. A comparison of the effect of barrier membranes on clinical and histologic hard and soft tissue healing with ridge preservation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020; 40 (3): 365—371. PMID: 32233189
  39. Araújo M.G., Lindhe J. Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22 (1): 9—13. PMID: 21091539
  40. Belov V.D., Bychkov A.I. Method of application of minimally invasive system for vertical extrusion of teeth. In: proceedings of the “Topical issues in dentistry” conference. Kazan: Kazan State Medical University, 2020. pp. 48—53 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 42707745
  41. Huchyk I.S. Analysis of root extrusion clinical case. In: proceedings of the “Modern technologies in medical education” conference. Minsk: Belarusian State Medical University, 2021. Pp. 1163—1165 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 47356837
  42. Gvetadze R.Sh., Arzhantsev A.P., Perfil’ev S.A., Sharova E.V. Clinical and radiological aspects of immediate dentures for the preparation of prosthetic bed before dental implantation. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2013; 6: 15—20 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 21109333
  43. Pavlenko O.V., Opanasjuk A.S., Gargin V.V. Morphological studies of bone structures during orthodontic extrusion of teeth in experimental conditions. Bulletin of Dentistry. 2019; 3 (108): 2—7 (In Ukr.). eLIBRARY ID: 41804856
  44. Llaquet M., Pascual A., Muñoz-Peñalver J., Abella Sans F. Periodontal and periapical outcomes of surgical extrusion: A prospective clinical volumetric study. J Endod. 2022; 48 (2): 213—222. PMID: 34848250
  45. Huang G., Yang M., Qali M., Wang T.J., Li C., Chang Y.C. Clinical considerations in orthodontically forced eruption for restorative purposes. J Clin Med. 2021; 10 (24): 5950. PMID: 34945246
  46. Zuccati G., Bocchieri A. Implant site development by orthodontic extrusion of teeth with poor prognosis. J Clin Orthod. 2003; 37 (6): 307—11; quiz 313. PMID: 12866212
  47. Salama H., Salama M. The role of orthodontic extrusive remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior to implant placement: a systematic approach to the management of extraction site defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993; 13 (4): 312—33. PMID: 8300319
  48. Neumeyer S., Hopmann S., Stelsel M., Morig G., Gotz W., Hanfland L., Gosau M. A biologic treatment concept for the extraction alveoli: Replantation and extrusion of root segments. Implantologie. 2014; 22 (2): 149—58.
  49. Panin A.M., Sidorenko V.O., Tsitsiashvili A.M., Ektova A.P., Gabidullina K.R. The use of grafts from remote auctentia 3 molars plastic surgery of the alveolar bone. Clinical case. Russian Bulletin of Dental Implantology. 2019; 1—2 (43—44): 22—30 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 42525512
  50. Badalyan V.A., Apoyan A.A., Parinov D.A., Brutyan V.A., Elfimova­ N.V. Application of the technique of preserving the volume of the alveolar bone by using a fragment of the extracted tooth to cover the alveola in comparison with the alveolas of the extracted teeth healing under the blood clot. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2020; 3 (95): 82—87 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 44008072
  51. Kubilius M., Kubilius R., Gleiznys A. The preservation of alveolar bone ridge during tooth extraction. Stomatologija. 2012; 14 (1): 3—11. PMID: 22617329
  52. Le H.T., Redko N.A., Taekin L.A., Drobyshev A.Yu. Analysis of the effectiveness of techniques for preserving the volume of holes of removed teeth in the pre-implantation period. Russian Stomatology. 2022; 1: 57—59 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 48470550
  53. Plotino G., Abella Sans F., Duggal M.S., Grande N.M., Krastl G., Nagendrababu V., Gambarini G. Clinical procedures and outcome of surgical extrusion, intentional replantation and tooth autotransplantation a narrative review. Int Endod J. 2020; 53 (12): 1636—1652. PMID: 32869292
  54. Plotino G., Abella Sans F., Duggal M.S., Grande N.M., Krastl G., Nagendrababu V., Gambarini G. Present status and future directions: Surgical extrusion, intentional replantation and tooth autotransplantation. Int Endod J. 2022; 55 Suppl 3: 827—842. PMID: 35279858
  55. Kuperschlag A., Keršytė G., Kurtzman G.M., Horowitz R.A. Autogenous dentin grafting of osseous defects distal to mandibular second molars after extraction of impacted third molars. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2020; 41 (2): 76—82; quiz 83. PMID: 32017585
  56. Menicanin D., Hynes K., Han J., Gronthos S., Bartold P.M. Cementum and periodontal ligament regeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015; 881: 207—36. PMID: 26545752
  57. Rijal G., Shin H.I. Human tooth-derived biomaterial as a graft substitute for hard tissue regeneration. Regen Med. 2017; 12 (3): 263—273. PMID: 28350271

Downloads

Received

July 4, 2022

Accepted

July 29, 2022

Published on

October 30, 2022