DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_25

Augmentation alveolar ridge of the jaws to dental implantation in case of significant bone atrophy

Authors

  • N.V. Kalakutsky 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, professor of the Oral and maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2493-5498
  • Yu.V. Ivanov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor of the Oral and maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1450-5953
  • I.V. Zhuravlev 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor of the Oral and maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6742-5703
  • 1 Pavlov University, 197022, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Restoration of chewing efficiency and elimination of aesthetic defect associated with the absence of teeth is an actual topic, especially in cases where there is a defect of bone tissue associated with either long-term tooth absence and bone resorption, or trauma or tumor process. Many techniques have been proposed to eliminate such defects of the jaw and reconstruct the alveolar process of the upper jaw or the alveolar part of the lower jaw. There are 3 main operative techniques: the use of autogenous bone chips and autogenous bone blocks, the use of the principles of guided bone regeneration (GBR) with resorbable and non-resorbable membranes and various combinations of these techniques. Purpose of the study - increase the effectiveness of treatment for patients with defects of the alveolar process of the upper jaw and the alveolar part of the lower jaw for further dental implantation. . 137 people took part in the study from 2019 to 2021, 50 of them men and 87 women. Bone grafting was performed using the above techniques in all cases. 50 of these patients got a questionnaire, which reflects the severity of the pain syndrome in conditional points and the duration of postoperative tumor. . 134 patients achieved a good result; the volume of bone tissue was enough for dental implants. In one case (GBR), the augmentate turned out to be loose, in two more cases (bone block grafting), the implants had to be removed after 3-4 weeks, as a result of their mobility and progressive bone loss. According to the survey data, the results were practically no different from each other, both indicate a similar discomfort received from these 2 types of surgery. . Reconstruction the alveolar bone allows to achieve good results for dental implantation in the future, however, the use of autogenous bone chips and autogenous bone blocks allows to get bone substitute, that close to natural bone and in a shorter time.

Key words:

bone augmentation, autogenous bone graft, bone defect of the jaw, guided bone regeneration

For Citation

[1]
Kalakutsky N.V., Ivanov Yu.V., Zhuravlev I.V. Augmentation alveolar ridge of the jaws to dental implantation in case of significant bone atrophy. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (3): 25—31. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_25

References

  1. Mirskiy M.B. History of Russian transplantology. Moscow: Medicine, 1985. 240 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Kalakutsky N.V., Sadilina S.V. Results of mandibular augmentation by bone splitting technique in patients assigned for implant prosthodontics. The Dental Institute. 2016; 2 (71): 51—53. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 26388361
  3. Kalakutskii N.V., Petropavlovskaya O.Ju., Kalakutskii I.N., Sadilina S.V. Lateral border of scapula a new bone-grafting site for alveolar ridge reconstruction prior to implant placement. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2017; 3: 66—73. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 32872906
  4. Smeets R., Matthies L., Windisch P., Gosau M., Jung R., Brodala N., Stefanini M., Kleinheinz J., Payer M., Henningsen A., Al-Nawas B., Knipfer C. Horizontal augmentation techniques in the mandible: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent. 2022; 8 (1): 23. PMID: 35532820
  5. Urban I. Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation. Quintessence, 2017. 400 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Luczyszyn S.M., Papalexiou V., Novaes A.B. jr, Grisi M.F., Souza S.L., Taba M. jr Acellular dermal matrix and hydroxyapatite in prevention of ridge deformities after tooth extraction. Implant Dent. 2005; 14 (2): 176—84. PMID: 15968190
  7. Proussaefs P., Lozada J. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation. J Oral Implantol. 2006; 32 (5): 237—47. PMID: 17069168
  8. Misch C.M., Jensen O.T., Pikos M.A., Malmquist J.P. Vertical bone augmentation using recombinant bone morphogenetic protein, mineralized bone allograft, and titanium mesh: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30 (1): 202—7. PMID: 25615925
  9. Rocchietta I., Simion M., Hoffmann M., Trisciuoglio D., Benigni M., Dahlin C. Vertical bone augmentation with an autogenous block or particles in combination with guided bone regeneration: A clinical and histological preliminary study in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18 (1): 19—29. PMID: 25622713
  10. Chappuis V., Cavusoglu Y., Buser D., von Arx T. Lateral ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and guided bone regeneration: A 10-year prospective case series study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19 (1): 85—96. PMID: 27476677
  11. Donkiewicz P., Benz K., Kloss-Brandstätter A., Jackowski J. Survival rates of dental implants in autogenous and allogeneic bone blocks: A systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57 (12): 1388. PMID: 34946333
  12. Aloy-Prósper A., Carramolino-Cuéllar E., Peñarrocha-Oltra D., Soto-Peñaloza D., Peñarrocha-Diago M. Intraoral onlay block bone grafts versus cortical tenting technique on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2022; 27 (2): e181-e190. PMID: 35218647
  13. Tarasenko S.V., Krechina E.K., Eisenbraun O.V. The study results of the alveolar ridge mucosal microcirculation after bone augmentation using the Tunnel Technique method. Stomatology. 2018; 1: 47—49. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 32449469
  14. Polupan P.V. Bone grafting and dental implants: View of a problem. Medical alphabet. 2014; 13: 32—35. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22800728
  15. Sipkin A.M., Modina T.N., Chenosova A.D., Tonkikh-Podolskaya O.A. Morphological assessment of the bone structure of the alveolar growth in the use of atocticosity and xenomaterial, with the addition of unstable hyaluronic acid. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2020; 2 (94): 67—72 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 43125607
  16. Langer B., Langer L., Sullivan R.M. Vertical ridge augmentation procedure using guided bone regeneration, demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, and miniscrews: 4- to 13-year observations on loaded implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30 (3): 227—35. PMID: 20386779
  17. Kulakov A.A., Amkhadova M.A., Korolev V.M., Kulakov Al.A. Surgical methods of the patients rehabilitation with the expressed jaws bone atrophy. Parodontologiya. 2006; 1 (38): 67—70. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 9305323
  18. Badalyan V.A., Shor E.I., Elfimova N.V., Apoayn A.A., Bagirov T.M. Experience of the immediate dentoalveolar reconstruction method in the aesthetically important zone in order to preserve volume of bone and soft tissue. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2018; 4 (88): 26—29 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 36517610
  19. Ilyin S.V. Evaluation of prospects for piezosurgical technique in critical alveolar ridge atrophy. Stomatology. 2022; 3: 97—98 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 48615541
  20. Kalakutsky N.V., Zhuravlev I.V., Ivanov Ju.V. Rehabilitation of patient with large jaw cyst. The Dental Institute. 2017; 4 (77): 56—57 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 32302016

Received

June 27, 2022

Accepted

August 4, 2022

Published on

October 30, 2022