DOI:
10.37988/1811-153X_2025_1_130Functional analysis 3D software used in maxillofacial surgery
Downloads
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to analyze the available software for planning operations in maxillofacial surgery and surgical dentistry, with an assessment of the capabilities and prospects of domestic programs in the conditions of international sanctions.Materials and methods.
The study analyzed the functionality of programs for planning operations based on domestic and foreign software products. Systems such as Materialize, Dolphin, 3D Systems, Brainlab, Planmeca, as well as Russian developments Avantis3D, Endoprint, Bonabyte, Medgital Vision and Autoplan were considered. A comparative description of their functionality, advantages and limitations has been made. The possibility of replacing foreign programs with domestic analogues under sanctions was assessed.
Results.
The study showed that the Russian programs Avantis3D, Endoprint and Bonabyte have functionality comparable to their foreign counterparts, which makes them a full-fledged alternative for use in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry. However, bioprinting remains one of the areas where domestic developments are still lagging behind.
Conclusion.
Russian developments can fully replace foreign programs in most clinical cases, which is especially important under sanctions. Further research and development is needed in the field of bioprinting and robotics.
Key words:
maxillofacial surgery, dental surgery, 3D modeling, navigation, software, 3D printingFor Citation
[1]
Ivanov S.Yu., Milyukova D.Yu., Sviridenko A.D., Muraev A.A., Gusarov A.M., Borozdkin L.L., Kuznetsov A.M., Sedov I.A. Functional analysis 3D software used in maxillofacial surgery. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2025; 28 (1): 130—142. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2025_1_130
References
- Hassfeld S., Mühling J.Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery — a review and an assessment of technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 30 (1): 2—13. PMID: 11289616
- Li M., Shen S., Zhao Z., Wang B., Yu H.The application of a fully digital approach in the treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion: a preliminary study. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23 (1): 237. PMID: 37095513
- Spille J., Helmstetter E., Kübel P., Weitkamp J.T., Wagner J., Wieker H., Naujokat H., Flörke C., Wiltfang J., Gülses A.Learning curve and comparison of dynamic implant placement accuracy using a navigation system in young professionals. Dent J (Basel). 2022; 10 (10): 187. PMID: 36285997
- Bhalerao A., Ayoub A., Marimuthu M., Wahab A., Kumar V.Cost-effectiveness of the flapless insertion of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation — A Retrospective Study. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 13 (2): 211—215. PMID: 38405562
- Sozzi D., Filippi A., Canzi G., De Ponti E., Bozzetti A., Novelli G.Surgical navigation in mandibular reconstruction: Accuracy evaluation of an innovative protocol. J Clin Med. 2022; 11 (7): 2060. PMID: 35407667
- Czako L., Sufliarsky B., Simko K., Sovis M., Vidova I., Farska J., Lifková M., Hamar T., Galis B.Exploring the practical applications of artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning in maxillofacial surgery: A comprehensive analysis of published works. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11 (7): 679. PMID: 39061761
Downloads
Received
October 3, 2024
Accepted
February 28, 2025
Published on
April 7, 2025