DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2025_1_78

Digital planning of dental implantation using axiography in a patient with a non-fixed bite

Authors

  • N.E. Degtyarev 1, postgraduate at the Maxillofacial surgery and surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-7799-3878
  • A.A. Muraev 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, professor of the Maxillofacial surgery and surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-3982-5512
  • G.G. Kazarian 1, postgraduate at the Maxillofacial surgery and surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-3532-983X
  • R.F. Mukhametshin 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor of the Maxillofacial surgery and surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0001-6975-7018
  • S.S. Ivanov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor of the Maxillofacial surgery and surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-4058-1706
  • 1 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The absence of a reproducible central occlusion previously posed a challenge for performing digital axiography due to the inability to align different types of data within a single coordinate system. In this article, we present a developed digital algorithm for planning dental implantation in a patient with partial tooth loss and a non-fixed bite. Special attention in this methodology was given to determining the centric relation of the jaws in a digital format, as well as the position of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) heads relative to the slopes of the articular eminences. During the digital planning process, axiography was performed on a patient with a non-fixed bite using radiopaque markers. The new mandibular position obtained from the axiographic analysis served as the basis for modeling the future temporary prosthesis, which guided the planning of implant placement. Surgical guides and scanning templates were fabricated, enabling the transfer of the virtual model of the postoperative jaw relative to its original position. This allowed for the alignment of the postoperative scan of the upper jaw with the model of the lower jaw. Based on the available data, a temporary prosthesis on straight abutments was fabricated and fixed in the oral cavity on the 3rd day after implant placement.

Key words:

dental implantation, surgical guides, temporomandibular joint, digital planning, axiography

For Citation

[1]
Degtyarev N.E., Muraev A.A., Kazarian G.G., Mukhametshin R.F., Ivanov S.S. Digital planning of dental implantation using axiography in a patient with a non-fixed bite. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2025; 28 (1): 78—83. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2025_1_78

References

  1. Sodhi A., Sharma A.K., Bansal P. Esthetics in implant dentistry — Prosthetic considerations. Qazipara: Updent Publication, 2023. Pp. 40—49.
  2. Ragazzini N., Baldissara P., Monaco C., Ciocca L. Digital jaw relation record of edentulous patients in the CAD-CAM workflow of the implant-supported full-arch prosthesis. J Oral Implantol. 2021; 47 (1): 57—62. PMID: 32662838
  3. Joda T., Zarone F., Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17 (1): 124. PMID: 28927393
  4. Joda T., Brägger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 (12): 1430—5. PMID: 25179680
  5. Utz K.H., et al. Is there “A best” centric relation record? Centric relation records, condyle positions, and their practical significance. Int J Prosthodont. 2023; 36 (3): 262—272. PMID: 36484682
  6. Sevbitov A.V. Introduction to clinical gnathology: textbook. Moscow: Sechenov University, 2013. Pp. 70—74 (In Russian).
  7. Le C., et al. Automatic segmentation of mandibular ramus and condyles. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021; 2021: 2952—2955. PMID: 34891864
  8. Chkhikvadze T.V., Roschin E.M., Bekreev V.V. Comparative analysis of the application of virtual and mechanical articulators in functional diagnostics. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2020; 1: 38—51 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 42690987
  9. Papaspyridakos P., et al. Digital vs conventional implant impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020; 29 (8): 660—678. PMID: 32613641
  10. Colombo M., Mangano C., Mijiritsky E., Krebs M., Hauschild U., Fortin T. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17 (1): 150. PMID: 29237427
  11. Tahmaseb A., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl: 25—42. PMID: 24660188

Received

July 2, 2024

Accepted

February 25, 2025

Published on

April 7, 2025